Elevate your enterprise information expertise and technique at Transform 2021.

Let the OSS Enterprise publication information your open supply journey! Sign up right here.

It’s tough to overstate the function that open supply performs in right now’s technology-centric world, provided that it intersects with nearly each piece of software program. Data from Synopsys, the corporate behind open supply safety administration platform Black Duck, signifies that 98% of codebases include not less than some open supply code.

But open supply software program is just not solely consuming the world, as the favored expression goes, it’s additionally devouring the photo voltaic system — latest GitHub information confirmed that just about 12,000 GitHub builders contributed to the code that made the very first Martian helicopter flight potential on April 19, 2021. Chances are, although, most weren’t even conscious that their contributions had been used within the historic NASA mission.

But world of open supply is just not at all times a easy path to journey. The sheer quantity and number of open supply software program packages makes it tough for even the most important of companies to find out what’s finest for his or her wants, whereas the myriad license sorts and related industrial pursuits creates friction and uncertainty. But even earlier than we get to all these complexities, it’s price taking a backward step to ascertain what open supply truly is.

So … what’s open supply?

“Open source” in its purest type refers to software program that’s made freely obtainable for anybody to entry, copy, modify, and redistribute. It’s finally a collaborative, community-led method that lowers the bar to entry and the price of constructing software program. This will be contrasted with proprietary “closed source” software program that’s constructed internally by a industrial firm, and which normally gained’t be actually “free” in any sense of the phrase; it may well’t be inspected, modified, or redistributed, and it’ll seemingly value one thing — if not arduous money, then by focusing on you with adverts.

However, greater than slightly nuance permeates all of this. As famous, most software program depends on not less than some open supply parts, together with that created by all the foremost firms akin to Google, Microsoft, and Facebook. And many of those firms additionally launch a few of their very own inside applied sciences as open supply software program.

The time period “open source” has just about emerged as extra of an umbrella time period below which many subsets exist, a few of which aren’t as free and versatile as others, with completely different restrictions and licensing (see under) in place. And many debates ensue over whether or not one thing actually is “open source” prefer it claims.

Thus we now have “free and open source software” (FOSS) to explain what many would argue is the truest and purest type of open supply: that which can be utilized for any objective with out restrictions together with having the ability to distribute copies to others, whereas the supply code can be totally obtainable to anybody wishing to change and enhance it. Any modifications, nevertheless, needs to be made obtainable to different customers too.

This is to not be confused with freeware, which is just simply software program that doesn’t include a direct monetary value hooked up to it, however which seemingly gained’t have any of the freedoms related to open supply software program. Richard Stallman, founding father of the Free Software Foundation, famously helped outline what is supposed by “free” in FOSS when he stated:

Free software program is a matter of liberty, not value. To perceive the idea, it is best to consider ‘free’ as in free speech, not as in free beer.

To emphasize that the “free” denotes liberty relatively than monetary value, the time period FLOSS (“free/libre open source software”) is commonly used as a substitute. But for all intents and functions, FOSS and FLOSS imply the identical factor.

Deviating from the pure FOSS (or FLOSS) ethos results in different phrases that you’ll typically come throughout within the open supply sphere. “Source available” refers to software program that makes the supply code obtainable to view and even make modifications in some cases, although the license gained’t give full rights to share and modify. Source obtainable ought to to not be confused with precise open supply software program.

A great instance of that is Lumberyard, a free recreation engine that Amazon launched again in 2016 to assist builders create cross-platform video games. The firm finally made the supply code obtainable to anybody below a proprietary license, permitting builders to customise their venture utilizing GitHub, whereas Amazon additionally accepts code contributions from the group. But the T&Cs are fairly clear that that is no open supply venture, provided that customers can’t publicly launch the Lumberyard engine supply code anyplace outdoors of its official GitHub dwelling and, crucially, can’t create their very own recreation engine off the again of Lumberyard.

In making Lumberyard supply code obtainable (and free to make use of), Amazon needs to make the platform stickier for recreation builders, luring them away from rivals akin to Unity and Unreal. And integrating Lumberyard tightly into its ecosystem, together with Twitch and its AWS cloud platform, is the place Amazon finally earns its coin.

Commercialization and licensing

All this isn’t to say that commercialization and open supply software program can’t be mates, although — removed from it. Commercial open supply software program (COSS) firms are ample, and normally are a single firm that monetizes an open supply venture by way of promoting extra providers or add-ons akin to analytics or safety that may enchantment to greater companies. Often, however certainly not at all times, all these companies are additionally the open supply venture’s chief builders — that’s, they’re in control of sustaining the venture and committing code modifications to the principle code base.

This is the place it’s price taking note of the assorted licensing preparations that completely different open supply software program tasks make use of. “While very permissive licenses are common, the ecosystem is made up of many different types of licenses,” Facebook’s head of open supply Kathy Kam informed VentureBeat. “It’s important to understand what stipulations come along with different pieces of software. For example, a license may restrict the commercial uses, preventing you from using that software to offer a particular service. Or it may require that derivative products are also open sourced. It’s important to read the fine print, especially as it may relate to what your business can or cannot do.”

MySQL, for instance, is an open supply relational database administration system that Oracle releases below a twin license — one a GNU General Public License (GPL), the opposite proprietary. The former affords a lot of the freedoms one would count on from FOSS, although the license is what is called copyleft, which implies that any by-product software program have to be issued below related license phrases. In different phrases, new software program constructed from the open supply software program have to be launched below the same open supply license.

Oracle’s secondary license is the way it commercializes MySQL, promoting it below the MySQL Enterprise Edition banner, which presents extra providers not included within the GPL license, akin to a totally managed database service; an enterprise-grade information backup service; a doc retailer; and safety smarts akin to encryption and a firewall. Also, firms holding the industrial license are allowed to promote MySQL-based merchandise with out making the by-product product open supply.

In distinction to copyleft licenses akin to GPL, so-called permissive software program licenses such because the MIT License, GNU All-permissive License, and the Apache license don’t impose by-product software program restrictions, making it simpler for a non-public firm to repurpose it as a part of a proprietary product. In reality, they may additionally re-license their new software program below a GPL license if they want.

A great instance right here is React, a JavaScript library for constructing consumer interfaces, which was developed by Facebook and open-sourced in 2013, and has subsequently been utilized by many big-name firms. However, Facebook was compelled to change to an MIT license following developer blowback over its earlier use of a “BSD+Patents” license that featured a controversial key clause: Essentially, any developer utilizing React of their app relinquished their proper to sue (or counter-sue) Facebook for any patent infringement.

Today, React is without doubt one of the prime open supply tasks by nearly each metric, and it ought to maybe come as little shock that the preferred open supply tasks, together with Kubernetes, TensorFlow, Vue, and React, have all been launched below a permissive license akin to MIT or Apache. Developers — significantly industrial ones — don’t like restrictions.

This helps to focus on how licensing has emerged as a contentious problem within the open supply world. Oftentimes an organization will swap an open supply venture to a far much less permissive license to guard its funding. Earlier this yr, Amazon’s AWS revealed it was forking Elasticsearch, the Java-based open supply engine for storing, looking out, and analyzing giant volumes of information, alongside the related information visualization dashboard Kibana.

Forking, for the uninitiated, is the method of taking the unique supply code and creating a brand new program that’s impartial from the unique. It is usually thought-about a foul factor within the OSS realm because it tends to result in rigidity between the communities that develop every incarnation, and causes basic friction. However, forking is normally deemed the one means ahead for an OSS venture when two (or extra) completely different entities develop completely different priorities.

In the case of Amazon and Elasticsearch, the transfer got here after Elastic, the non-public firm that spearheads Elasticsearch and Kibana, confirmed it was transitioning from a permissive Apache License to a twin supply obtainable Server Side Public License (SSPL) and a proprietary Elastic License. The principal objective of this modification, Elastic stated, was to forestall cloud service suppliers akin to AWS from providing Elasticsearch as a service themselves. In different phrases, Elastic needed to curtail main expertise firms from benefiting from its arduous work with out essentially investing adequate sources again into the venture itself.

Although Elastic insinuated that Elasticsearch was nonetheless an open supply venture (e.g. it stated it was “doubling down on open”), the Open Source Initiative (OSI) doesn’t acknowledge the SSPL license as open supply. The OSI board wrote:

Outside contributors donated time and power with the understanding that their work was going in direction of the higher good, the general public software program commons. Now, as a substitute, their contributions are embedded in a proprietary product. If they need to benefit from the fruits of their very own and their co-contributors’ labor, they need to comply with a proprietary license or fork.

Aside from industrial open supply software program, you may also learn similar-sounding terminology to mainly describe the identical factor. Red Hat, the gargantuan industrial open supply software program purveyor acquired by IBM for $34 billion again in 2018, refers to its software program as “enterprise open source.” In a latest interview with VentureBeat, Red Hat expertise evangelist Gordon Haff distinguished its merchandise from a typical industrial open supply product by describing it as one thing that provides “a hardened product for the enterprise, including added security, [and] vendor support 24/7.”

It’s most likely simply semantics, however a multi-billion greenback firm seeking to dive head first into open supply software program may be extra enticed by one thing known as “enterprise open source.”

Finally, one other time period you’re prone to encounter within the open supply realm is “open core.” This is type of just like the dual-licensing mannequin that some firms have adopted to commercialize open supply tasks, although many have asserted that “open core has nothing to do with open source.”

Open core is a means of commercializing open supply software program by providing a restricted set of options within the free version, whereas promoting add-ons as premium options. This actually intersects with the rules of twin licensing, however open core maybe leans towards extra of a freemium enterprise mannequin — a primary set of options is obtainable to everybody below a free license, however all of the juicy helpful stuff must be purchased below a proprietary license.

“The ‘core’ could be licensed under a permissive license that doesn’t place any restrictions on how the software can be used, but generally lacks all the ‘bells and whistles’ of a commercial offering,” stated Martin Traverso, one of many cocreators of the distributed SQL question engine Presto, which is now often known as Trino. “This model tends to be more compatible with projects that are independent or not owned by a single company.”

With a twin licensing mannequin, an organization can also promote extra options or providers below a proprietary license, however a typical differentiator right here is that the proprietary license will typically take away any copyleft restrictions (i.e., the client can then promote their software program with out having to make it open supply).

“Dual licensing also typically requires that the copyright to the software be owned by a single entity that has the power to make those licensing decisions,” Traverso added.

So whereas the distinctions can get slightly muddy, open core is maybe extra to do with characteristic availability than the licensing per se.


Depending on who you communicate to, open supply software program is safer than proprietary software program as a result of its code is within the “open” for anybody to investigate, or it’s much less safe for that very same cause provided that anybody can simply entry it. Recent information from Synopsys discovered that 84% of codebases include not less than one open supply vulnerability.

“There’s always a potential for cybercriminals to try and leverage openness for malicious purposes,” famous Facebook product supervisor for open supply Michael Cheng. “However, we’ve found that the advantages and benefits of open source greatly outweigh this risk. We have observed that good communities are quick to respond to security vulnerabilities — contributors amass support very quickly to patch these kinds of issues. Thus assessing the health of a community is just as important as the technological merits of a particular open source project.”

And it is a key level price choosing up on — the group is integral to any open supply venture, and the variety of lively contributors is indicative of its total well being. But simply because one thing is open supply doesn’t imply that it’s inherently safer. If a venture isn’t actively maintained and hasn’t been up to date in 2 years, then it’s prone to be much less safe than a proprietary equal that’s usually up to date. And the very same precept applies the opposite means round.

“There is no security through obscurity — security depends on understanding your work and your security model, and this can be achieved with open source and proprietary systems,” stated Oskari Saarenmaa, cofounder and CEO at Aiven, an organization that manages open supply information infrastructure on all the foremost clouds.

However, open supply has the potential to be safer than proprietary software program. If you’re taking two items of software program, one open supply and one proprietary, each of which obtain lively updates, then likelihood is, the open supply incarnation will likely be safer by advantage of the truth that it may be inspected by hundreds of eyes.

“Open source gives you and the community a better chance of understanding the overall quality and maturity of a software system, and also allows you to repair and modify systems as needed,” Saarenmaa added. “Whether or not proprietary software packages are properly maintained can be much harder to assess.”


VentureBeat’s mission is to be a digital city sq. for technical decision-makers to achieve information about transformative expertise and transact. Our website delivers important info on information applied sciences and methods to information you as you lead your organizations. We invite you to change into a member of our group, to entry:

  • up-to-date info on the themes of curiosity to you
  • our newsletters
  • gated thought-leader content material and discounted entry to our prized occasions, akin to Transform 2021: Learn More
  • networking options, and extra

Become a member